DILEMMA OF A WIDOWED MOTHER
Now I was wondering why Kunti forced her sons to set back. All she had to do was to complain to Bhisma and he would have just overthrown Dhritarashtra and coronated Yudhishthir as the king of Hastinapur.
But it was not that simple. Bhisma was bounded by his promise that he would always serve as a “Sevak” to the throne and never rebel against it. And Kunti behaved like any other widow mother in India who had sons to protect but no husband to help with the job and relatives from her husband’s side who acted like vultures in order to hold on to the property. This is quite a common scenario in India- a widowed mother is thrown out of her husband’s house along with her children by her husband’s brother. Even when her sons come of age and are strong enough to take revenge, to possess their rightful position she forbids them to do so. Why? “we are happy with what we have. What do we need more? Whom will you fight with? With your own uncle and cousins?” these remain common words of a mother.
Moreover, in the Indian scenario it is a common thing if a son protests and fights with his deceased father’s relatives for property or any other possession, it is always the mother who is held responsible for bad parenting. Society will accuse the mother of provoking her sons. Even in my surroundings, I have witnessed that a widowed mother happens to be quite afraid because she does not have her husband, a male protector by her side. So, she accepts all the ill-treatments and misjudgements meted out to her and her sons in fear of other members of the family.
In Mahabharata, Kunti acted in the same way. She knew if they went back to Hastinapur someone is destined to die. Either her sons or her parenting.
Comments
Post a Comment